Stigma Related to the Non-Medical Use and Diversion of Prescription Stimulant Drugs: Should We Care.

BACKGROUND: Non-medical use (NMU) and diversion of prescription stimulants are prevalent on college campuses. Diversion represents a primary source of acquisition for NMU among young adults. This study examined relationships between stigmatizing beliefs related to NMU and diversion of stimulant medications and engagement in these behaviors, as well as how such perceptions are associated with indicators of psychological distress among those who engage in these behaviors. METHODS: Young adults (N = 384) were recruited from a large US university to participate in this cross-sectional electronic survey-based study. Relationships between stigma variables and NMU and diversion were assessed. Among those who engage in NMU and diversion, we tested relationships between stigma variables and indicators of psychological distress, using validated instruments. RESULTS: Perceived social and personal stigmatic beliefs did not significantly predict NMU. However, perceived social and personal stigma of diversion significantly reduced diversion likelihood. For NMU, associations were found between stigma variables and indicators of psychological distress. Markedly, we found that as stigmatic perceptions of NMU increased, so did depressive, anxiolytic, and suicidal symptomatology among those who engage in NMU. CONCLUSIONS: Stigmatization does not deter NMU; however, stigmatization is positively associated with psychological harm among those who engage in NMU. Interventions should be developed to reduce stigmatization in order to improve psychological health among those who engage in NMU. Stigmatic perceptions of diversion were not predictive of psychological harm, though they are negatively associated with diversion behavior.

Differences in the relation of binge drinking and prescription drug misuse to suicide ideation and attempts between college-aged adults and adults above the age of 25: Findings from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH).

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the role of age in risk associated with drug misuse and binge drinking, this study examines the differential relations of binge drinking and prescription drug misuse to risk of suicidal ideation and attempts in young adults of college age (18-24) compared to those above the age of 25. METHODS: We used data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) for the years 2015 through 2019 (N = 269,078). RESULTS: The study found that, for adults above college age, the presence of any past-month binge drinking was associated with a higher likelihood of past-year suicide ideation (b = 0.427, OR = 1.532, 95%CI [1.388, 1.692]) and attempts (b = 0.637, OR = 1.891, 95%CI [1.271, 2.813]) compared to college-aged adults. Similarly, past-month prescription drug misuse showed stronger associations with past-year suicide ideation (b = 0.831, OR = 2.297, 95%CI [1.952, 2.701]) and attempts (b = 0.539, OR = 1.715, 95%CI [1.264, 2.327]) in adults above college age. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight that binge drinking and prescription drug misuse appears to become more strongly associated with suicide ideation and attempts after adults age beyond young adulthood.

Prescription Opioid Diversion Sources Among African Americans: Implications for Overdose Prevention.

Recent data show that African Americans (AAs) experienced a greater increase in overdose deaths involving prescription opioids relative to other racial/ethnic groups. One possible mechanism through which elevated risk for overdose is conferred to AAs could be due to greater exposure to contaminated counterfeit pills. Unfortunately, prescription opioid diversion is understudied among AAs and less is known regarding which sources AAs use to access pharmaceutical opioids. The objective of this study, therefore, was to identify and describe the most commonly used diversion sources for prescription opioids among AAs. Qualitative interview data are also presented to contextualize the most prevalent sources. This study used data from the Florida Minority Health Study, a mixed-methods project that included online surveys (n = 303) and qualitative in-depth interviews (n = 30) of AAs. Data collection was conducted from August 2021 to February 2022 throughout Southwest Florida. Analyses revealed that the most widely used sources for prescription opioids were dealers (33.0%) and friends/relatives (34.7%). Additionally, interview data indicated that dealers are the access point where larger volume acquisitions are made and high potency formulations are accessed. These findings suggest that AAs may utilize nonhealthcare related sources at higher rates than healthcare related sources to acquire prescription opioids. This is concerning because opioid pills acquired through nonhealthcare related sources are especially susceptible to fentanyl adulteration. These findings invite further study using nationally representative data to determine if AAs disproportionately use nonhealthcare related sources compared to persons from other racial/ethnic groups.

Consumo de antibióticos en los primeros meses de vida: un estudio transversal / Antibiotic consumption in the first months of life: A cross-sectional study

Introducción: Los factores y patrones asociados al consumo de antibióticos en los lactantes no están claros. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la incidencia acumulada de consumo de antibióticos desde el nacimiento hasta los 16meses e identificar los factores asociados al consumo de antibióticos entre lactantes de 4 a 16meses. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal en 2016 que incluyó una muestra de la población de 18.882 mujeres españolas de Galicia que habían dado a luz a un niño vivo entre el 1 de septiembre de 2015 y el 31 de agosto de 2016. Se calculó la incidencia acumulada de consumo de antibióticos a partir de los resultados de la entrevista a la madre sobre el consumo del lactante desde el nacimiento hasta los 14meses; no se estimó a los 15 y 16meses debido al reducido tamaño muestral. Para valorar las características asociadas al consumo de antibióticos se anidó en el estudio transversal un estudio de casos y controles emparejando por mes de nacimiento, un control por caso. Resultados: La incidencia acumulada de consumo de antibióticos entre los lactantes de 0 a 14meses de edad aumentó del 7,5% al 66,0%. Para el estudio de casos y controles, se obtuvo información de 1.852 casos y de 1.852 controles. La asistencia a la guardería (OR: 3,8 [IC95%: 3,2-4,6]), tener hermanos/as mayores (OR: 1,8 [IC95%: 1,6-2,1]), las consultas sanitarias en la clínica privada (OR: 1,6 [IC95%:1,4-2,0]) o haber estado expuesto al humo ambiental de tabaco (OR: 1,3 [IC95%: 1,1-1,6]) se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de consumo de antibióticos. Tener madres de entre 30 y 39años o de 40años y más en el momento del parto se asoció con un menor riesgo de consumo de antibióticos (OR: 0,8 [IC95%: 0,7-1,0] y OR: 0,6 [IC95%: 0,5-0,8], respectivamente).(UA)

Introduction: The factors and patterns associated with antibiotic consumption in infants are unclear. Our aim was to assess the cumulative incidence of antibiotic consumption from birth to 16 months and identify factors associated with antibiotic consumption among infants aged 4 to 16 months. Material and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 2016 in a sample of 18,882 women from Galicia, Spain, who had given birth to a live child between September 1, 2015 and August 31, 2016. We calculated the cumulative incidence of antibiotic consumption based on maternal reports regarding the infant's consumption from birth to 14 months obtained through interviews; we did not estimate consumption at ages 15 and 16 months due to the small sample size. To assess which factors were associated with antibiotic consumption, we carried out a nested case-control study matching cases and controls for birth month on a 1:1 ratio. Results: The cumulative incidence of antibiotic consumption among infants aged 0 to 14 months increased from 7.5% to 66.0%. The case-control study included data for 1,852 cases and 1,852 controls. Daycare attendance (OR: 3.8 [95%CI: 3.2-4.6]), having older siblings (OR: 1.8 [95%CI: 1.6-2.1]), health care visits to private clinics (OR: 1.6 [95%CI: 1.4-2.0]), and passive smoking (OR: 1.3 [95%CI: 1.1-1.6]) were associated with an increased probability of antibiotic consumption. Maternal age between 30-39 years or 40 years and over at the time of birth was associated with a decreased probability of antibiotic consumption (OR: 0.8 [95%CI, 0.7-1.0] and OR: 0.6 [95%CI: 0.5-0.8], respectively). Conclusions: Some of the factors associated with antibiotic consumption in infants are modifiable and should be considered in the development of public health measures aimed at reducing antibiotic consumption.(AU)

Challenging Disability Discrimination in the Clinical Use of PDMP Algorithms.

State prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) use proprietary, predictive software platforms that deploy algorithms to determine whether a patient is at risk for drug misuse, drug diversion, doctor shopping, or substance use disorder (SUD). Clinical overreliance on PDMP algorithm-generated information and risk scores motivates clinicians to refuse to treat-or to inappropriately treat-vulnerable people based on actual, perceived, or past SUDs, chronic pain conditions, or other disabilities. This essay provides a framework for challenging PDMP algorithmic discrimination as disability discrimination under federal antidiscrimination laws, including a new proposed rule interpreting section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act.

Associations of Adolescent School Social Networks, Gender Norms, and Adolescent-to-Young Adult Changes in Male Gender Expression With Young Adult Substance Use.

PURPOSE: Male gender expression (MGE), which is shaped by sociocultural pressures around masculinity, has been previously associated with health. This study examines associations of adolescent social network variables and school gender norms with MGE changes from adolescence to young adulthood, and associations of these changes with young adult substance use. METHODS: Analyzing data from Waves I (1994-95, adolescents, aged 12-18) and IV (2008-09, young adults, 24-32) of a nationally representative longitudinal cohort study, male participants' MGE was assessed in each wave using a validated, empirically derived measure. Linear regression was used to evaluate associations of adolescent-to-young adult MGE changes between waves with adolescent social network characteristics and school gender norms. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between adolescent-to-young adult MGE changes and young adult substance uses (cigarette, marijuana, heavy alcohol, and recreational drug use, and prescription drug misuse). RESULTS: Among 4,776 male participants, adolescent-to-young adult MGE changes were significantly associated with school gender norms such that adolescents whose MGE markedly departed from their schools' average exhibited greater MGE changes in the direction of their schools' average (ß = -0.83, p < .01) relative to those who were more similar to school means. Adolescent-to-young adult increases in MGE were significantly associated with greater odds of all young adult substance use behaviors except prescription drug misuse. DISCUSSION: Adolescents' MGE relative to other males at their school was associated with MGE changes toward school norms, with implications for young adult substance use. Adolescent gender norms may be an underexplored strategy for interventions to reduce substance misuse.

Opioid misuse among people with HIV: results from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) 2015-2019.

Aim: Pain is a major challenge in the management of HIV/AIDS. This research analyzed the prevalence of substance use and opioid misuse among people with HIV (PWH) and those without (PWoH) in the USA. Methods: Using data from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the study assessed misuse of pain relievers and opioids in 279,025 individuals. Results: PWH were about 1.88-times more likely to misuse pain relievers and 1.85-times to misuse opioids than PWoH, with a notable rise in hydrocodone and tramadol misuse. Conclusion: The data highlights an imperative for interventions targeting substance misuse among PWH, addressing the complex nexus of HIV, chronic pain and opioid use.

The prevalence of prescription opioid use and misuse among emergency department patients in The Netherlands.

RATIONALE: Prescription opioid use and misuse have increased rapidly in many Western countries in the past decade. Patients (mis)using opioids are at risk of presenting to the emergency department (ED) with opioid-related problems. European data concerning prescription opioid (mis)use among the ED population is lacking. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine prevalence of prescription opioid use, misuse, and opioid use disorder (OUD) among Dutch ED patients. Secondary objectives were to explore factors associated with prescription opioid misuse and the number of patients discharged with a new opioid prescription. METHODS: In a cross-sectional multicenter study at three hospitals in the Netherlands, adult ED patients were screened for current prescription opioid use. Opioid users filled out questionnaires regarding opioid (mis)use, and underwent a structured interview to assess OUD criteria. The primary outcomes were prevalence rates of (1) current prescription opioid use, (2) prescription opioid misuse (based on a Current Opioid Misuse Measure [COMM] score > 8), (3) OUD, based on DSM-5 criteria. Independent T-tests, Pearson χ2 and Fisher's Exact tests were used to analyse differences in characteristics between groups. RESULTS: A total of 997 patients were screened, of which 15% (n = 150) used prescription opioids. Out of 93 patients assessed, 22.6% (n = 21) showed signs of prescription opioid misuse, and 9.8% (n = 9, 95% CI: 4.5-17.8) fulfilled criteria for OUD. A medical history of psychiatric disorder was significantly more common in patients with prescription opioid misuse and OUD. CONCLUSION: This study shows that prescription opioid use is relatively common in ED patients in the Netherlands, compared to the overall population. Over one fifth of these patients shows signs of opioid misuse or OUD. Awareness among ED personnel about the high prevalence of prescription opioid (mis)use in their population is critical for signalling opioid-related problems.

Predicting first use of heroin from prescription opioid use subtypes: Insights from the Monitoring the Future longitudinal panel.

BACKGROUND: Only a small proportion of individuals who initiate nonmedical use of prescription opioids (NUPO) transition to heroin, suggesting that more nuanced aspects of NUPO may be better indicators of risk for escalating opioid use trajectories. This study leveraged panel data to identify NUPO typologies based on NUPO characteristics associated with opioid risk trajectories (route of administration, motives) and compared rates of heroin initiation at follow-up across typologies. METHODS: Latent class analyses were run among respondents with no history of heroin use from the Monitoring the Future Panel Study (base year N=10,408) at modal ages 18, 19/20, 21/22, 23/24, and 25/26. Indicators included oral NUPO, nonoral NUPO, and NUPO motives to experiment, have a good time with friends, get high, escape problems, manage pain, relax, and sleep. Heroin initiation at follow-ups through modal age 29/30 was predicted from class membership. RESULTS: No NUPO, self-medication (oral, manage pain), recreational (oral, nonoral, experiment, get high, have a good time with friends), and mixed-motive (all routes, all motives) classes emerged. Heroin initiation rates did not differ across no NUPO and self-medication classes; recreational and mixed-motives classes initiated heroin at higher rates than the other classes and comparable rates to each other. Non-NUPO drug use prior to heroin initiation was prevalent in recreational and mixed-motive classes. CONCLUSIONS: NUPO does not uniformly or uniquely increase risk for heroin initiation. Leveraging more nuanced indicators of risk for heroin use and targeting polysubstance use in addition to opioid-specific programming may enhance the efficacy of public health efforts.

Motivations for Misusing Opioids Among African Americans.

BACKGROUND: A wide range of opioid misuse motives have been documented in the literature, including to relieve physical pain, feel good/get high, relax, manage feelings/emotions, sleep, and moderate the effects of other substances. Despite a rise in opioid misuse among African Americans over the last 2 decades, their motivations for misuse remain unclear. Much of the research on opioid misuse motivations either rely on samples with little racial diversity or do not stratify their findings by race. As a result, less is known about the specific reasons why African Americans engage in opioid misuse. The objective of this study, therefore, was to identify and explain the most common motives for misusing opioids among African Americans. Qualitative interview data are also presented to explain/contextualize the most prevalent motivations. METHODS: This study used data from the Florida Minority Health Survey, a mixed-methods project that included online surveys (n = 303) and qualitative in-depth interviews (n = 30) of African Americans. Data collection was conducted from August 2021 to February 2022 throughout Southwest Florida. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that while some (33.9%) misused opioids for purposes of recreation/sensation seeking (eg, feel good/get high), the majority (66.1%) were attempting to self-treat perceived medical symptoms (eg, physical pain, anxiety/trauma, withdrawals, insomnia). CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to a better understanding of why some African Americans engage in opioid misuse and findings highlight the need for interventions to be trauma informed and address unmanaged physical pain among African Americans. Given that most studies on motivations are quantitative in nature, the study contributes to the literature by capturing the voices of African Americans who use drugs.

Associations between cannabis use, opioid misuse and severe psychological distress in adolescents: A cross-sectional school-based study.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis use and nonmedical use of prescription opioids are consumed by a small to moderate number of adolescents. However, little is known about their combined influence on mental health in this age group. This study examined the association between cannabis use, nonmedical use of prescription opioids, or both with serious psychological distress among adolescents and tested if sex could moderate these associations. METHODS: We based our analyses on cross-sectional data from the 2019 Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey, a provincially representative sample of students in grades 7 through 12 (aged 11-20 years or older) across Ontario, Canada (n= 7097; mean age: 15.2 ± 1.2 years). Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for important covariates. RESULTS: We found that 20.5% reported cannabis use only, 5.8% reported opioid use only, and 5% reported both cannabis and opioid use. Cannabis use only (odds ratio [OR]:1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.53-2.37), opioid use only (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.63-3.00), and both cannabis and opioid use (OR: 3.24; 95% CI: 2.25-4.66) were associated with greater odds of serious psychological distress after adjustment for covariates. Associations were similar for males and females. CONCLUSION: The use of both cannabis and opioids is significantly associated with serious psychological distress among adolescents. Adolescents who use both cannabis and opioids represent a small and vulnerable group that should be targeted in future interventions against mental health problems. Health professionals should consider screening for polysubstance use, especially when working with adolescents who use cannabis.

Sources of nonmedically used prescription psychotherapeutic drugs using real-world data from adolescents and adults assessed for substance use treatment--2014-2022.

BACKGROUND: Nonmedical use (NMU) of prescription psychotherapeutic drugs (PPD) may increase risk for significant morbidity and mortality in the overdose crisis. OBJECTIVE: This study examines sources of PPD using real-world data from adolescents and adults reporting past 30-day NMU of PPDs. METHODS: A convenience sample of individuals aged ≥10 years assessed for substance use disorders (SUD) treatment was analyzed using the 2014-2022 National Addictions Vigilance Intervention and Prevention Program datasets. PPD include prescription opioids, prescription tranquilizers/sedatives, and prescription stimulants. RESULTS: Overall, among assessments of adolescents aged 10-18 years (N = 1991) and young adults aged 19-24 years (N = 15,166), "family/friend" (46.08-47.41 %) and "dealer" (33.82-42.71 %) were the most common sources. Among assessments of adults aged ≥25 years (N = 89,225), "own prescription" was the most common source and increased in frequency as age increased. Across all age groups, "family/friend" was the most frequent source for all drug classes (41.96-48.76 %) except for nonmedically used buprenorphine/methadone, for which "own prescription" was the most common source (51.85 %) among adults. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates heterogeneity in sources of nonmedically used PPD across age groups. Tailored prevention strategies for different age groups and improving timely access to medical care to ensure proper treatment of chronic medical conditions including SUD are needed.

Opioid and benzodiazepine misuse in the United States: The impact of socio-demographic characteristics.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2021, drug overdose deaths in the United States reached a new record of 107,622. Misuse of opioids and benzodiazepines accounts for a large portion of drug overdose deaths. However, the effects of socio-demographic characteristics on misuse of opioids and benzodiazepines are not evident. Thus, this study examines the socio-demographic characteristics associated with misuse of opioids and benzodiazepines among adults in the United States. METHODS: Data from 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health was utilized in the multinomial logistic regression analysis and included 202,935 adults ages ≥18 years. RESULTS: During 2015-2019, 3.3% of the adults misused opioids, 1.2% misused benzodiazepines, and 0.9% misused both drugs in the preceding year of the survey. Those who were younger, bisexual, non-Hispanic White, had a history of delinquency in the past year, had alcohol dependence/abuse, marijuana dependence/abuse, nicotine dependence and use, and experienced major depressive episodes were more likely to misuse opioids, benzodiazepines, or both. CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: A large portion of US adults are misusing opioids, benzodiazepines, and both drugs. Specifically, bisexual individuals experience higher odds of opioid misuse, benzodiazepine misuse and misuse of both drugs compared with heterosexuals, while males are experiencing lower odds of benzodiazepine misuse compared with females. Individuals aged 26-49 experience the highest odds of opioid misuse, though misuse of both drugs was higher among the 18-25 age group. Findings underscore the use of targeted preventive measures to reduce misuse of these drugs among at-risk populations identified in this study.

Electronic survey investigating UK veterinarians' perceptions of the potential for veterinary prescription medication misuse or abuse.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate veterinarians' experience and perception of the risk of veterinary prescription medication (VPM) misuse and abuse by the public and veterinary professionals and to determine the clinical context in which respondent veterinarians prescribed certain VPMs. STUDY DESIGN: Anonymous online voluntary survey. POPULATION: A total of 361 of 7126 veterinarians registered as practicing in the UK, who provided e-mail contact details to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Knowledge for participation in research. Respondents included general practitioners, with or without further qualifications, and European specialists, covering charity, private or academic small, large or mixed animal practice. METHODS: The anonymous online survey, open from September to December 2021, posed 27 questions regarding personal experience and perception of VPM misuse or abuse, including which VPMs were considered most at risk of abuse by clients or veterinary staff. Thematic analysis was performed on free-text sections. RESULTS: The participation rate was 5% (361/7126), and the completion rate 60% (216/361 respondents). Of these, 88% of respondents somewhat agreed, agreed or strongly agreed that some VPMs were at risk of abuse. A third (29.9%; 107/358) had suspected an owner of taking VPMs, and one fifth (20.1%; 72/358) had suspected veterinary staff. Perceptions regarding the likelihood of public VPM abuse ranged from not suspecting a problem to having first-hand experience. Drugs considered most at risk of owner abuse were opioids, benzodiazepines and gabapentin, and those for veterinary staff were opioids, benzodiazepines and ketamine. Numerous 'red flags' prompting suspicion of VPM abuse were identified alongside ways of mitigating risk. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Veterinarians in the UK reported varied experiences with, awareness of, and attitudes towards VPM abuse by the public and veterinary staff. Although not quantified, the UK veterinary industry could be a source of abusable drugs.

An on-line school-based substance use harm reduction programme: The Illicit Project randomized controlled trial results.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to measure the effectiveness of an on-line, neuroscience-based harm reduction intervention (The Illicit Project) on substance use, harms and knowledge over a 12-month period. DESIGN: We used a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The study was conducted at eight secondary schools across New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 950 (mean age = 15.9; standard deviation = 0.68) in grades 10-12 at participating schools in 2020 took part. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: The Illicit Project intervention group (schools = five, n = 681) received an on-line, universal substance use and harm reduction programme over three classes. The active control group (schools = three, n = 269) received school-based health education as usual. MEASUREMENTS: Self-report questionnaires assessed primary [alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), cocaine and prescription drug misuse] and secondary outcomes (alcohol-related harms and drug literacy) at baseline and the 6- and 12-month follow-up assessment. FINDINGS: Approximately 63% (n = 595) of the sample completed the 12-month follow-up assessment, including 58% of the intervention group (n = 396/679) and 66% of the active control group (n = 179/271). Participants in the intervention group had slower annual increases in binge drinking [odds ratio (OR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.12-0.89], nicotine use (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.52-1.23), MDMA use (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.02-1.00), cocaine use (OR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.01-0.64) and prescription drug misuse (OR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01-0.54) compared with the active control group. There was limited evidence of an intervention effect on cannabis use and alcohol-related harm (P > 0.5). The secondary outcomes showed that the intervention group maintained higher levels of drug literacy knowledge (ß = 3.71, 95% CI = 1.86-5.56) and harm reduction help-seeking skills (ß = 1.55, 95% CI = 0.62-2.48) compared with the active control group. CONCLUSION: The Illicit Project (an on-line, neuroscience-based substance use harm reduction intervention) was effective in slowing the uptake of risky substance use and improving drug literacy skills among late secondary school students in Australia, compared with school-based health education as usual.

Immediate release fentanyl. Real world data on abuse and dependence in Spain / Fentanilo de liberación inmediata. Datos de vida real de abuso y dependencia en España

Purpose: A substantial increase in the prescription of immediate release fentanyl (IRF) outside hospitals was observed in previous studies between 2012 and 2017, however it remains unknown the extent of immediate release fentanyl use disorders (IRFUD). This study aimed to estimate the incidence and risk factors of IRFUD, such us abuse and dependence, in Spain during this period. Methods: Retrospective cohort study performed in a Spanish electronic primary care healthcare records database (BIFAP). The incidence rate of IRFUD was calculated by dividing the number of incident cases by the total patient-years (p-y) of exposure. Demographic data, lifestyle, cancer diagnosis, comorbidities and concomitant medication were described and analyzed overall and in patients developing IRFUD using Cox regression models. Effect of the type of treatment (continuous/discontinuous) and duration were also evaluated. Results: The incidence of IRFUD in the 12,267 patients analyzed was 1.8 cases per 100 p-y of exposure. Baseline analysis showed higher frequencies of IRFUD for smokers, patients with a history of substance abuse, non-oncology indication and diagnosis of depression and anxiety, respect to non-IRFUD patients. Patients aged ≥ 80 were less likely to develop IRFUD abuse/dependence. Significant differences were for concomitant use of other treatments with potential for dependence and abuse, such as benzodiazepines. The risk of IRFUD increased with treatment duration, being the highest for treatments lasting 180 days and longer. Conclusion: Incidence of IRFUD is difficult to contrast due to the lack of similar studies. It could be considered not too higher outside hospitals but possible in cancer and non-cancer patients... (AU)

En estudios previos se ha observado un aumento considerable en la prescripción de fentanilo de liberación inmediata en el ámbito extrahospitalario entre 2012 y 2017. Sin embargo, aún se desconoce la magnitud de dependencia y abuso derivada de su uso. Este estudio tiene como objetivo estimar la incidencia y los factores de riesgo de los trastornos derivados del uso de fentanilo de liberación inmediata en España, tales como el abuso y la dependencia durante este período. Métodos: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo realizado en España en la base de datos de historias clínicas electrónicas de atención primaria (BIFAP). La tasa incidencia de trastornos por el uso de fentanilo, se calculó dividiendo el número de casos incidentes entre el total de personas-año de exposición. Se analizaron datos demográficos, estilo de vida, diagnóstico de cáncer, comorbilidades y medicación concomitante. Para el análisis se utilizaron modelos de regresión de Cox. También se evaluó el efecto del tipo de tratamiento (continuo/discontinuo) y la duración de tratamiento. Resultados:La incidencia de trastornos por el uso de fentanilo en los 12,267 pacientes analizados fue de 1.8 casos por 100 personas-año de exposición. Se observó una frecuencia más elevada en aquellos pacientes que al inicio del tratamiento eran fumadores, pacientes con antecedentes de abuso de sustancias, con indicaciones no oncológicas y en pacientes con diagnóstico de depresión y ansiedad en comparación con los pacientes que no desarrollaron el evento. Los pacientes mayores de 80 años presentaron menos probabilidades de desarrollar estos trastornos. Se observaron diferencias significativas en el uso concomitante con otros tratamientos con potencial de desarrollar dependencia y abuso, como las benzodiacepinas. El riesgo aumentó con la duración del tratamiento, siendo más elevado para aquellos tratamientos que duraban 180 días o más... (AU)

Determinants of prescription opioid misuse among Black Americans: Evidence from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

BACKGROUND: Opioid misuse, including prescription opioid misuse, remains a significant public health concern impacting various ethnoracial groups in the United States, including non-Hispanic Black Americans. This study provides more recent evidence on prescription opioid misuse among Black Americans. METHODS: We used data from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to examine the prevalence and determinants of prescription opioid misuse among Black American adults aged 18 and older. We compared these findings to non-Hispanic White American adults. RESULTS: The prevalence rate of past-year prescription opioid misuse was very similar among Black (3.4%) and White respondents (3.8%). Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses found no significant racial differences in prescription opioid misuse. Religious importance and rurality were negatively associated with misuse only among Black respondents. Depressive episodes, other drug use, age, and risk-taking behaviors were associated with prescription opioid misuse among both Black and White respondents. CONCLUSION: Black and White Americans remain at risk for prescription opioid-related problems. Religiosity and rurality require further investigation to understand how they may impact misuse among Black Americans.